Eva Vedder vs Carolina Kuhl Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 13 Nov at 07:09 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Vedder vs C. Kuhl

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Vedder 1 - 0 Kuhl
They have played 1 sets in total, with Eva Vedder winning 1 and Carolina Kuhl winning 0. The last match between Eva Vedder and Carolina Kuhl was at the W35 Orlando, 13-11-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Eva Vedder getting the victory 6-2 ret..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Vedder | 1 |
| Kuhl | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W35 Orlando(11-13-25)
E. Vedder vs C. Kuhl H2H Profile
E. Vedder vs C. Kuhl Match Preview:
- Eva Vedder's recent second serve win rate is 42.58%, slightly outperforming Carolina Kuhl's 40.00%. How significant is this small advantage? It could be crucial given its strong connection to match outcomes.
- Carolina Kuhl excels in return games, securing 51.65% of second serve return points, compared to Eva Vedder's 46.61%. Can this edge in return games drive Kuhl to victory?
- For first serve returns, Kuhl again holds the upper hand with 34.17%, compared to Vedder's 30.84%. Will this consistency in return games shape the match?
- When under pressure, Kuhl saves 51.56% of breakpoints, whereas Vedder saves 47.06%. Does Kuhl's composure in critical moments provide an advantage?
- In match performance over the past year, Vedder shows dominance with a 61.11% win rate, surpassing Kuhl's 43.48%. Does this reflect a broader pattern of superiority?
- Both players favor Hard courts with a 60% win rate. Could this shared strength level the playing field?
- At Challenger/ITF tournaments (> $10K), Vedder wins 62.07% of her matches compared to Kuhl's 45.00%. Does Vedder's experience at this level make her a clear favorite?
- Vedder faces tougher opponents, with an average rank of 313.06, while Kuhl competes against an average rank of 474.8. Could this reflect Vedder's higher competitive exposure?
- In deciding sets, Vedder holds a slight edge with a 46% win rate versus Kuhl's 43%. Could Vedder's resilience shine through in crucial moments?
- Vedder's breakpoint conversion stands at 36.77%, outperforming Kuhl's 31.16%. Will this make a decisive impact during the match?
Editorial Prediction (November 13, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing their performance trends, Eva Vedder displays a slight advantage in several key areas. Her marginally better second serve performance and higher breakpoint conversion indicate a potential edge.
Carolina Kuhl's strength in returning games could pose challenges, yet Vedder's composure under pressure and superior overall win rate suggest she may handle crucial moments better.
Overall, Vedder's experience against higher-ranked competitors and her strong performance in deciding sets make her the more likely candidate to win the upcoming match.
Eva Vedder vs Carolina Kuhl Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Vedder vs C. Kuhl H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 6 | Games Won | 2 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 0:34:52 | Average Match Time | 0:34:52 |
| 60% (12/20) | 1st Serve % | 63% (17/27) |
| 67% (8/12) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (10/17) |
| 75% (6/8) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (5/10) |
| 50% (1/2) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (12/27) | Return Points Win % | 30% (6/20) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Vedder Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 1-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
QF | L | 1-6 6-2 7-6(7) | ||
R2 | W | 6-2 ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-0 6-0 | ||
F | W | 6-3 7-6(6) | ||
C. Kuhl Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-2 ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
QF | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 5-7 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 3-6 6-1 | ||

E. Vedder vs C. Kuhl Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.22% (262/188) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.24% (96/81) |
| 57.57% (593/437) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.58% (217/188) |
| 53.45% (5063/4410) | Games Win/Loss | 51.60% (1870/1754) |
| 59.74% (92/62) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.71% (17/11) |
| 57.66% (158/116) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.34% (57/46) |
| 55.56% (10/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 47.83% (22/24) |
| 50.00% (2/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1088 | Aces Total | 293 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 1114 | Total Double Faults | 504 |
| 1:32:18 | Average Match Time | 1:46:1 |
| 446.69 | Average Opponent Rank | 470.66 |
| 58% (15512/26651) | 1st Serve % | 62% (7254/11617) |
| 64% (9911/15479) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (4351/7254) |
| 49% (5447/11194) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1987/4363) |
| 48% (1585/3281) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (744/1505) |
| 46% (12373/27189) | Return Points Win % | 47% (5484/11642) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57.14% (8/6) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 56.52% (156/120) | Challenger W/L | 48.78% (60/63) |
| 62.75% (96/57) | Futures W/L | 67.92% (36/17) |
| 58% (257/443) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (95/174) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (46/97) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (16/28) |
| 46% (62/136) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (28/54) |
| 83% (280/233) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (96/80) |
| 16% (280/45) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (96/16) |
| 16% (170/28) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (81/16) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Kimberly Birrell vs Talia Gibson Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

Flavio Cobolli vs Zizou Bergs Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, SF, ITA – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Jeline Vandromme Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Maria Lourdes Carle vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets
